Blend

CJC-1295 No DAC + Ipamorelin

A blend of two compounds studied for effects on growth-hormone signaling: CJC-1295 and ipamorelin.

Open calculator → View research listing ↗External listing at JD BioWorks

Whole vial: 10 mg Vial math ↓

01 / Overview

Why people look it up

This blend is discussed because both named ingredients affect growth-hormone signaling. People then speculate about recovery, sleep, and body composition.

  • Growth-hormone signals from individual ingredientsLIMITED HUMAN EVIDENCE

    Human studies measured hormone signals for separate ingredients; the CJC-1295 study used a different, DAC-containing form. Read source ↗

  • Muscle gain or fat loss from this blendINSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

    Hormone changes in separate ingredient studies do not prove a body-composition benefit from the combined vial. Read source ↗

  • Better sleep or recoveryCOMMUNITY / ANECDOTAL

    These are commonly reported goals, without a controlled human outcome study of this blend. Read source ↗

The labels show the evidence for each claim. Open a row for its source.

02 / Amounts & schedules

Dosage at a glance

Published chart examples

Dosage source summary

Lower example
100 mcg each
Middle example
200 mcg each
Higher example
250–300 mcg each
How often
Once daily in the published example
Time on / time off
The chart does not establish an agreed break schedule.
Route
Subcutaneous in that chart

Per ingredient: CJC-1295 No DAC + ipamorelin in a 1:1 blend. Not the total blend amount and not interchangeable with DAC forms.

These source amounts do not establish a safe human dose for a research vial.

Sources & individual reports
Source of the amount boxes
  • PeptideDosages published chart; reviewed October 18, 2026

Per ingredient: CJC-1295 No DAC + ipamorelin in a 1:1 blend. Not the total blend amount and not interchangeable with DAC forms. Source check: 2026-10-18.

Source coverage: 2 reviewed public accounts. Separate examples, not a representative sample.

Report 1 ↗Secondhand / firsthand status unclear

Amount reported
100 mcg of each named ingredient
How often reported
once daily before bed
Reported duration / cycle
about six weeks
Route (how it was taken)
not stated

What the account says: Poster reported one IGF-1 value before and after; no controlled comparison or independent product testing was supplied.

Product match & source details

Product match: The reported products and blend ratio were not verified as the same as this listed combination.

r/Peptidesource post about a subject · Posted: date not independently verified · Reviewed: 2026-10-03.

Report 2 ↗First-person account

Amount reported
150 mcg CJC-1295 No DAC plus 200 mcg ipamorelin each time
How often reported
five days weekly; two days off
Reported duration / cycle
three weeks by original post
Route (how it was taken)
injection; precise route not stated

What the account says: Poster described better sleep and slightly faster workout recovery but also substantial daytime sleepiness. No controlled attribution or vial testing.

Product match & source details

Product match: Separate No DAC CJC and ipamorelin use was described; seller blend not verified.

r/Peptidesource firsthand post · Posted: 2024-07-26 · Reviewed: 2026-10-03.

How much agreement is there? Two checked accounts describe different formulations or goals. One sleep/recovery account also reported substantial sleepiness; no typical range is established.

Public sources last reviewed: 2026-10-03. Product identity and reported results were not independently verified. Source method →

03 / Go deeper

Evidence, sources & vial math

What the research actually showsHuman studies, evidence limits and mechanisms
Published evidence, separate from public reports

What has actually been studied?

How we read studies ↗

Small human studies measured hormone release for individual compounds. A frequently cited CJC-1295 study used the long-acting DAC form, not this No DAC blend. Those hormone measurements are not proof of recovery or muscle benefits.

Evidence limits: The exact contribution of each blend ingredient, the ratio in this vial, and a tested human regimen for this combination are not established here.

Product status: Research-vial listings are not FDA-approved medicines. Approved-use labels on this page refer only to the named finished prescription product.

Human research

No human outcome study of this exact No DAC CJC-1295 plus ipamorelin blend was extracted in this review. Published human hormone measurements for CJC-1295 with DAC and for ipamorelin concern separate ingredients and do not establish sleep, recovery, body-composition, or safety outcomes for the mixture.

Reviewed cited studies and the linked product or regulator documentation; absence of an extracted trial is not proof that no study exists.

Study and prescription-product amounts describe those sources. They do not select an amount for an online research vial.

How researchers think it might work

The two named ingredients are discussed because they stimulate growth-hormone release through different signaling pathways. That does not establish how the combined No DAC vial behaves in a person.

Show scientific explanation

CJC-1295 with DAC activated the growth-hormone releasing-factor receptor in animal work; ipamorelin stimulated growth-hormone release through a growth-hormone secretagogue pathway. These studies concern separate compounds, and the cited CJC form has DAC, unlike the listed blend. Read supporting source ↗

Vial & syringe mathTurn the vial total and liquid volume into concentration and syringe units
Make sense of the vial

Vial & syringe math

Change the vial total and final liquid volume to see what each U-100 syringe mark represents.

The starting 1 mL is a math example. Enter your final mixed volume to update the numbers.

Concentration (mg per mL)—
In 1 U-100 syringe unit—
In 10 U-100 syringe units—

100 U-100 syringe units = 1 mL. These results assume the labeled amount is evenly mixed through the final liquid volume.

Continue in the calculator →
About this listingResearch-use-only status, seller names and additional background

A research material is not intended for human use. Its name or lab report does not establish suitability for a person. What research use only means →

Compiled by PeptideWhy · Scientific sources last checked 2026-10-03 · Editorial policy · Corrections